Advent: Wherever The Poor Take Refuge

December, 2011                                  by mark colville

“I wonder if [human]kind is not really at the point of being divided between those who believe

and those who do not believe in the future of the universe…” Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, S.J.

(1881-1955)

“I am the voice of one crying in the desert, ‘Make straight the way of the Lord’…” John the

Baptist

ADVENT (noun): A coming into being, arrival… (The Merriam Webster Dictionary)

ADVENT is this conversation we keep having, about how the WORLD is being saved by

BEAUTY and TRUTH and PEACE. Advent is a BABY crying… for JUSTICE. Advent is

GOD gently whispering in your ear, through MARY… “revolution…” Advent is God calling all

things NEW, and telling you to GO PROVE IT. Advent is God saying how PRECIOUS is Her

CREATION. Advent is a COSMIC EXTREME HOME MAKEOVER.

ADVENT is all those ILLUSIONS about the world that you carry around, as a child of

EMPIRE, getting SHATTERED. Advent is JESUS telling you YES, I can CAST OUT THAT

DEMON in your soul, the one that has you convinced there is NO POWER stronger than

DEATH. Advent is HOPE born, reborn, INDESTRUCTIBLE, unlimited, and asking YOU

for a place to stay for the night.

ADVENT is JOSE Y MARIA Y JESUS showing up in YOUR TOWN just as they did

in BETHLEHEM: homeless, UNDOCUMENTED, immigrants, strangers, a STRAIN on the

economy, OUTCASTS, persons of interest and usual SUSPECTS, potential SECURITY

threats, possible TERRORIST sympathizers… HOLY. FAMILY.

ADVENT is God’s memo to the effect that henceforth, THE PIE is no longer to be

sought in THE SKY. What the people at OCCUPY WALL STREET are doing:

THAT IS CALLED PRACTICING ADVENT.

ADVENT means SUDDENLY getting CALLED out of church to where CHRIST is

showing up in the world- on the MARGINS, on the BORDER, on the STREET, at the

SHELTER, under the BRIDGE, at the FORECLOSURE, on the PICKET LINE, in the TENT

on the green, in the MOVEMENT, in the JAIL, at GUANTANAMO, in the DESERT under

the FENCE, under the RADAR, under the BOMBS your nation is dropping,…

and in the bread that is broken wherever the poor take refuge.

ADVENT is making another PLACE at the table, and another, and ANOTHER, because

your heart knows… He’s GONNA SHOW UP. To find that place, go to your comfort zone,

then take a left, and keep on until dawn. FIND THAT PLACE, it’s called NAZARETH. Use

your spiritual GPS and leave your doubts home.

Nazareth… Can anything good come from Nazareth?…. COME AND SEE!!!

Merry Xmas, Happy Holidays, Love, Peace and all Good, from

The Amistad Catholic Worker.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Rosette Street Ramblings, Lent 2011

[This piece was originally published in the Lent 2011 issue of La Amistad, newsletter of the Amistad Catholic Worker.]

by Mark Colville

Three months ago, the world shifted and the ground underneath us shook. Father Tom died. I was walking down the hall to open the front door for my brother and his family, arriving from New Jersey to join us for Thanksgiving dinner, when the call came from Guatemala. He had gone to sleep peacefully at Casa Juan Gerardi the night before after writing to some friends, and then he went to God. Luz and I spent a few moments sobbing on the back stairs, and then returned to our guests, thinking it best not to share the news until the next day. A mentor and friend for over thirty years, Tom never failed to leave me with a challenge, and three months later, I’m still struggling to find my footing on a ground he no longer walks.

Luz and I travelled to Guatemala City with Leticia Cotto and Tom’s sisters for the funeral, which was a kind of whirlwind experience among friends and neighbors he’d shared his life with, from several different countries. It was the kind of funeral one wants to attend, because you know that the person being mourned lived such a beautiful, remarkable life that grief simply cannot rule the day. After the mass, everyone clogged the streets and walked behind the hearse, singing songs of hope all the way to the cemetery.

I wrote down these thoughts at the time:

“Father Tom Goekler was an apostle among the poor. He was a single-minded, single-hearted and tireless advocate for the betterment of people’s lives, literally all over the world.  He was a monk who chose to dwell in the noisiest, most crowded and stress-ridden places, practicing radical nonviolence, praying constantly and carrying the simple loving presence of God.  He afflicted our consciences with a clear and unbending sense of justice and morality, as well as a coherent analysis of the movement of evil in the world.  And he moved us- sometimes literally!- from where we were at to where we had ought to be.  Father Tom stood firm on principles that we often overlooked or thought unimportant, because his vision of right and wrong was never abstract; it was always rooted in his love for specific people and his desire to shoulder their burdens and be a part of their liberation. “

Thirty years ago Tom told me something, a piece of ancient, practical, spiritual wisdom that he’d first learned in Latin at the seminary. I must have needed to hear at the time, and it has since become a foundational understanding for my life in a Catholic Worker house. It is advice I’ve been leaning heavily on these days, and a kind of a mantra for every time I answer the door:

“You cannot give what you do not have.”

That pretty-much covers everything, from a piece of bread in the pantry, to a hot shower or a safe and warm place to sit awhile, to a bit of serenity, to an experience of being valued, loved and listened to. “We love because Christ first loved us (1John 4:19).” You cannot give what you do not have.

The Amistad Catholic Worker began with a vision that came out of the love with which Father Tom engaged the world, a love profoundly deepened by his encounter with Dorothy Day. He gathered us here in 1994, he gave us a house, and he willed this community of faith into being. In his life as a priest, by his preaching and example, and as a friend, Father Tom taught us how to love more effectively, in our context of empire, violence and nuclearism. And so we dedicate this issue of La Amistad to Father Tom’s memory, with one eye fixed on celebrating his life and the other on continuing the struggles that remain.

Please see page 8 for a report on Casa Juan Gerardi, the Catholic Worker house Tom left behind in Guatemala. Also, a eulogy given at Maryknoll, NY, can be found on our website: amistadcw.wordpress.net. Thanks…~

Leave a Comment

Filed under La Amistad Lent 2011, La Amistad Newsletter, Rosette Street Ramblings

Give Up War for Lent!

[This piece was originally published in the Lent 2011 issue of La Amistad, newsletter of the Amistad Catholic Worker.]

by Mark Colville

The Amistad Catholic Worker is holding a weekly vigil at the Federal Building in downtown New Haven, every Tuesday beginning on March 15th, from 4:30-5:30pm. We are joining the efforts of a broad coalition of New Haven-based organizations dedicated to using each day of the month leading up to Tax Day (April 15) to cry out: THESE ENDLESS WARS ARE KILLING US!

Indeed, in addition to the daily atrocities and indiscriminate killing which have become the norm for our nation’s military interventions, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq alone are estimated to cost taxpayers $28.5 billion a month! This money is not even counted in the regular military budget of $1trillion for FY 2011; it is discretionary spending that does not appear on the government’s ledger. For New Haven alone, the cost in terms of allocated dollars lost is $28 million dollars this year. Meanwhile in Wisconsin as well as New Haven and elsewhere, we witness an unrelenting attack on working people and unions; teachers, healthcare workers, firefighters and cops are vilified in public discourse and the media for fighting for a fair wage, pension and health coverage.

What better time than Lent to stand up and say: ENOUGH! Repent! Stop the killing, and stop the robbery! Our Tuesday vigils will place particular emphasis on the immorality of war, including the use of unmanned drones, which have wrought terror and untold bloodshed throughout Afghanistan, Pakistan and Gaza. We urge you to join us, and if you’d like to help with the organizing or make signs or leaflets, please call Mark Colville at (203)415-5896. For a calendar of daily events, go to http://bit.ly/hAOAbU. ~

Leave a Comment

Filed under La Amistad Lent 2011, La Amistad Newsletter

Casa Juan Gerardi Catholic Worker, Guatemala

[This piece was originally published in the Lent 2011 issue of La Amistad, newsletter of the Amistad Catholic Worker.]

by Mark Colville

Father Tom Goekler arrived in Guatemala in 2008, after eight years in San Pedro Sula, Honduras, where he had developed two very successful programs of outreach, advocacy and uplift for young people and their families: Caminando Por La Paz (Walking For Peace), and Jovenes En La Calle (Youth In The Street). Two of the Honduran young men who had passed through these programs and become leaders- Mario Torres and Odel Marin- accompanied Father Tom with the intention of replicating the programs in the barrios of Guatemala City. Their basic methodology and principles begin with a neighborhood-based communal lifestyle centered on nonviolence, prayer and the Eucharist, education and hospitality. As this lifestyle develops and deepens, community members begin to reach out to the surrounding neighborhood, invite others in, and provide an oasis of support and companionship to people and families in crisis. Leadership is developed with an emphasis on social transformation, beginning with the individual and extending outward to the neighborhood and beyond.

Upon arriving in Guatemala, they purchased a house that was no bigger than one-car garage, in a neighborhood known as Paraiso Dos, or “Paradise Two”, in the city’s Zone 18. Two years later they had built the house into a three-floor residence, hospitality and community center, complete with a classroom, library, five bedrooms, three bathrooms, and a beautiful chapel on the top floor overlooking the city and mountains beyond. (A group of us from Connecticut were on hand for the completion of the house’s construction, in April of last year.) They named the house after Monseñor Juan Gerardi, the martyred archbishop of Guatemala City who was killed in 1998 at the behest of corrupt forces opposed to his courageous work for human rights and defense of the poor.

Currently there are eleven people living in Casa Juan Gerardi, in addition to the many others who attend liturgies and make use of the facilities and services offered there. (A priest at a nearby parish has continued to celebrate masses in the chapel at the house since Father Tom’s passing.) All eleven members of the in-house community are on scholarships at area schools. In the absence of Father Tom, Mario and Odel have assumed increased mentoring responsibilities for the younger members. However, all are role models and agents of change in their neighborhood, all are accountable to the community’s principles, and all assume responsibility for the upkeep of the residence and its programs.

In deliberations on how to keep this ministry intact and growing, we have begun to identify some short-term and long-term goals. First, there is an immediate and urgent need for funding, both to continue the operation of Casa Juan Gerardi, and to ensure that those young people receiving scholarships through Caminando Por La Paz and Jovenes En La Calle can continue to attend school. Until now, these endeavors have been supported in part by a grant from Maryknoll, and by the fundraising efforts and personal sacrifices of Father Tom himself. Unfortunately, in the wake of Father Tom’s passing we’ve been informed by Maryknoll that they do not have anyone available to replace him. And, since Maryknoll’s funding is normally directed toward projects in which their personnel are directly involved, this means that the grant that Casa Juan Gerardi has been receiving from Maryknoll is being phased out as well. While we are hoping that this decision is not final, it is incumbent upon us now to make these programs financially independent of Maryknoll.

Mario Torres has provided us with comprehensive budget reports, which indicate that the cost of maintaining Casa Juan Gerardi’s operation is about $500 a month, or $6,000 a year. These reports further identify the combined cost of all current scholarships to be roughly $1,500 per month, or $18,000 per year. (This covers the scholarships, including books and school supplies, of 15 students: 9 in primary/secondary schools, and 6 attending university.)

Last year, Father Tom began the process of getting Casa Juan Gerardi incorporated; while this became complicated by his death, a lawyer in Guatemala has been assisting, and the process is now finally nearing completion. In the meantime, we have identified a local nonprofit organization- Comunitas, which is based in Manchester, Connecticut- that is ready and willing to receive donations for Casa Juan Gerardi, Caminando Por La Paz, and Jovenes En La Calle. Checks can be made out to “Comunitas/ Father Tom Fund”, and mailed to: Comunitas, PO Box 358, Manchester, CT, 06040. All donations will go directly toward maintaining and extending the reach of these programs in Guatemala. For those who might wish to consider taking on a specific aspect of the budget as explained above (for example, funding one scholarship or making a monthly commitment to pay a particular bill), we would be happy to provide some more detailed information.

This April, a group of adults and youth will again be traveling from Connecticut to Guatemala, to continue our collaboration with the folks at Casa Juan Gerardi. It is the fifth such visit in the past three years, and a vitally important aspect of our participation in the life of the community there. If you or someone you know might be interested in taking part in a future trip, we’d like to extend the invitation to contact us and learn more. People who have made this journey in the past are also prepared to make presentations on the experience to any and all interested groups, as part of the effort to raise awareness, participation, and the support needed to keep Casa Juan Gerardi going.

It is becoming ever more apparent that this is a critical moment for many people to whom Father Tom dedicated the last several years of his life. We ask you today to pray with us that each of their hopes and aspirations for a better future will be realized, and we ask you to consider what you might be able to do to make that future happen.~

Leave a Comment

Filed under La Amistad Lent 2011, La Amistad Newsletter

Reflections on My Stay at Amistad Catholic Worker, Spring 2010

[Selections from this piece were published in the Lent 2011 issue of La Amistad, newsletter of the Amistad Catholic Worker.]

by Ben Crosby

I’d like to begin with the names of two people, both of whom in their own ways have powerfully affected me during my stay here at Amistad Catholic Worker House.

The first is Jeffrey Jones. I do not believe I ever met this man, or if I did he did not introduce himself. There is no way I could pick his face out of a crowd. How is it that this man who I do not know came to be so important to me? The answer is tragic in its simplicity: he died. At around 9:45 on Tuesday, March 9th, I was sitting at the desk in the third-floor room of Amistad Catholic Worker House where I was staying, when I heard around a dozen sharp reports: gunshots or firecrackers. Tired after a few days of work at Amistad, I uncritically assumed the latter and crawled into bed. When I tramped down the stairs the next morning to help cook the breakfast, I soon learned that the noise I had heard last night was more than a few kids playing with explosives. No: at the corner of Rosette and Hurlburt, just a few meters from the house, two men had been shot. One was dead, and the other was in the hospital. The dead man’s name, as the New Haven Register eventually reported, was Jeffrey Jones.

My immediate response, unsurprisingly, was a certain amount of fear. These were the first shots I had ever heard fired in anger, by far the closest I had ever been to violent death. Of course, I soon recognized that I wasn’t truly in any danger: I was staying with the Catholic Workers, after all, who were respected by even the local drug dealers, and besides was always safely ensconced within the protective walls of Amistad by nightfall. Once my fear had subsided, it was anger that I felt. People shouldn’t be shot on my street. People shouldn’t have to worry about their safety when walking home from a late-night shift at the factory. The resigned, sardonic “Welcome to the Hill” which a grizzled community member uttered at breakfast in response to my shock utterly broke my heart.

And perhaps most infuriating of all were the comments on the New Haven Register website, comments much blunter but not so different in substance from statements I’d heard back at Yale: The people out in the Hill are “animals” or “dirtbags.” It’s a “jungle” out there. Let them kill each other — one less person for the police to deal with. Classist and racist undertones aside, I found the ignorance of these statements incredibly frustrating. As Mark mentioned to me when we talked about it later, these people were clearly trying to separate themselves from the tragedy: violent shootings are something that happens to ‘those’ people in the Hill, in the inner city — not here or to us! But having at least a basic understanding of the systemic factors leading to the perpetuation of cycles of violence, poverty, and crime in so many of our cities and having spent a few days at Amistad, seeing firsthand the people fishing through the garbage for cans to sell or the groups of jobless young men lounging about on street corners or creaky porches, I knew that we couldn’t separate ourselves from this. We are all, in some sense, complicit in the death of Jeffrey Jones. We may not have pulled the trigger, but we are complicit in our continued wholesale participation in a system that leads to murdered black men in our cities just as surely it leads to shiny new S.U.V.s and minivans in our pleasantly monotonous suburban subdivisions.

I would also like to introduce the reader to Stewart. Stewart is a fifty-five-year-old African-American man. With his unkempt goatee, doo-rag, and missing teeth, he is the sort of person, to be perfectly honest, whose presence would not so very long ago have caused me to pick up my pace and stare fixedly at the ground were I walking past him after dark. I started a conversation over dinner with him. Stewart told me that he plays the keyboard. He’d begun playing it in his early teens, and after playing for a few decades had gotten sick of it and planned to quit. However, taking a break from playing for a while, Stewart told me that he had felt called to start playing again. He realized that although he may not have had much, he did have this God-given gift of music, and it was a gift he could use in the service of others. Stewart is quite convinced that after his somewhat wild youth, his continued existence is thanks to the grace of God and the assistance of people like those here at Amistad, and told me with quiet passion that he hopes that his music will safe just one life like his.

Now, I know stories like these are often used to to subtly suggest to middle-class readers that the poor are happy with their lot, that their lack of material possessions makes them more compassionate and holy in ways that assistance would diminish. This of course is not my intent: living simply is commendable, but being forced to remain in an environment of degradation, rampant substance abuse, and want is, to put it mildly, not good. With this caveat stated, I am truly blown away by Stewart’s gratitude and desire to serve his fellow man. I claim to want to dedicate my life to the service of others (and hope and believe that its a sincere claim) and have a tremendous amount of things about which to be grateful, yet next to him I appear just another spoiled, self-interested bourgeois teen. And, as I wrote in my journal that night, “this,” just as much as Jeffrey’s death, “is Rosette Street.”

But I’m getting ahead of myself. An introduction is in order: my name is Ben Crosby. I’m from the suburbs of Chicago and am a freshman at Yale University, where I will likely major in religious studies. Raised a Lutheran, I was always very conscious of the social justice implications of my faith, and spent many hours with friends at Yale talking about what our theology should look like in practice. The Catholic Worker Movement came up in several of these conversations, and after reading a copy of the newspaper put out by the Open Door Community in Georgia, I decided to investigate the movement further. A few web searches later, I found Amistad Catholic Worker’s website and with it an email address. Desiring the opportunity to put some of the conclusions from those long conversations into practice, I wrote an email to Mark Colville asking whether it would be possible for me to spend my spring break as part of the Amistad Catholic Worker community. After I attended a few Masses and other events, Mark invited me to stay. So, Sunday, March 7, after completing a battery of midterm exams the week before, I walked through the gate and up the steps and into my home for the next two weeks.

It is now Thursday, March 18, and I find myself preparing to leave Amistad. The demands of classwork are beginning to press on me once more: there’s War and Peace to read, an essay on Faust to write, the daily routine of classes and extracurriculars are but a few days away. But I’ve been able to take a few hours this sunny afternoon to reflect on my time here, and in doing so I feel most of all a tremendous sense of gratitude to Mark, Luz, Herb, Lolo, Junior, the Colville kids, and everyone else associated with Amistad Catholic Worker for allowing me the privilege of participating in their community.

The work here, to be fair, isn’t always glamorous. If I had any romanticized notion of life at a Catholic Worker House as nothing but revolutionary political agitation (late-night meetings at the kitchen table, political rallies with shouted slogans, marches, etc.), they were soon quashed. Life here is more about keeping food on the table for people who might not eat otherwise than penning bombastic pamphlets about The Cause. My time has been largely occupied by cooking, cleaning (I’m now an expert at scrubbing grease off kitchen walls!), and reorganizing. But, in its own quiet way, Amistad Catholic Worker is more radical than than most of the student-activists I know back at school. For here are people who have made a conscious decision to live life simply, in solidarity with those that our society deems ‘animals’ and ‘dirtbags’ and expendable drains on state resources. Here is a place that really tries to be a community in a neighborhood that needs community desperately, where people sit down to break bread together and in doing so support each other. Mark often says — and I have noticed this phrase in various Catholic Worker publications as well — that Catholic Worker Houses aren’t institutions. And indeed, one of the most powerful aspects of meals at the House is that Amistad isn’t run like an impersonal, bureaucratic soup kitchen. Our neighbors come over to help us cook, and then we all eat together, and I’ve gotten to know Brenda and Bobby and Dawn and Rico and Marcos and Stewart as people in their own right, not just as drawn, weary faces in a queue.

I believe that one of the most important gifts that the people at Amistad have given me is the ability to put human faces on often clinical, unemotional presentation of statistics about poverty in our inner cities and in New Haven in particular. It has in some sense been a radicalizing experience for me: just as I know intellectually that the current configuration of the world political economy lets a tremendous number of people fall through the cracks, I now feel it on a visceral, emotional level. I’ve experienced it personally. Jeffrey Jones, age forty-three, is dead now. I hope that this both continues to inspire me to action and leaves me with a more profound ability to empathize with my fellow man.

While living here has both angered and saddened me, I am thankful that it has not left me trapped in the despair of urban degradation. Amistad is an oasis in a troubled neighborhood, a place where area retirees and unemployed come by to help make dinner, a place where the people of the Hill open their hearts and their wallets to aid each other in times of need, a place where Stewart talks about wanting to save young kids’ lives. I now know people who see the same injustices and inequities as I, and rather than succumbing to the despair which has beset so much of the theoretical Left, have dedicated themselves to living a life of radical openness and nonviolence, and, to paraphrase Dorothy Day, to struggling now both to provide daily food for those who will otherwise go without and to change the systems of exploitation and violence that prevent everyone, everywhere from having enough to eat. Grounded in faith and in a life of prayer, my friends here at Amistad still have that precious thing called hope. And as I’ve seen my faith and my prayer life strengthened during my time here, I am finding that same hope reaffirmed in me.

A question that has already been posed to me several times is how my experience here at Amistad will inform my life once I’m back at Yale. It’s a fair question; I know that when I get back I will be once again swept up into the life of exams, papers, performances, and so forth within that gated (literally!) community of privilege that is my university. Several people I have talked to, reacting with some incredulity at my passionate happiness here at Amistad, have remarked, “Ah, but you’re only there for two weeks.” And it’s true. I know that this is only a brief attempt at living radically, and that throughout the experience I always had the option of running back to my comfortable dorm room if the Hill became more than I could handle. And yes, although I will be back to Amistad as often as I can during the rest of the semester, the minor triumphs and catastrophes of undergraduate life will inevitably consume most of my time.

But I hope and believe that these two weeks will prove to be more than a quickly-forgotten spring break episode. I hope that I carry a little bit of the Hill with me when I’m back on campus. I hope that I don’t lose my sense that social justice isn’t a game for naive college students to play at or a hobby to be done in one’s spare time. I hope that I always remember Jeffrey and those gunshots that Tuesday night, and that I keep Stewart, and everyone else I interacted with here at Amistad, in my prayers. And I hope that these two weeks mark the beginning of a lifelong commitment to truly living life in solidarity with the poor.

As a parting thought, I’d like to share a few words by Archbishop Oscar Romero on the Virgin Mary. Now, as a Protestant, I was brought up to be very unfamiliar – and somewhat uncomfortable — with Mariology, but these words nonetheless resonate strongly with me:

Mary is not an idol.
The only Savior is God, Jesus Christ,
but Mary is the human instrument,
the daughter of Adam,
the daughter of Israel,
a people’s embodiment,
sister of our race,
who by her holiness was able to incarnate in history
God’s divine life.
The true homage that a Christian can make to Mary
is, like her,
to make the effort to incarnate God’s life
in the fluctuations of our fleeting history.

I pray that just as God incarnated Christ into our broken world through a poor, unmarried Jewish woman, God may act in my life so as to enable me to participate in the in-breaking of the Kingdom of Heaven and the proclamation of Jesus’ good news to the poor today. Amen.

Leave a Comment

Filed under La Amistad Lent 2011, La Amistad Newsletter

Afghanistan: Incalculable

[This piece was published in the Lent 2011 issue of La Amistad, newsletter of the Amistad Catholic Worker.]

by Kathy Kelly

March 3, 2011

Recent polls suggest that while a majority of U.S. people disapprove of the war in Afghanistan, many on grounds of its horrible economic cost, only 3% took the war into account when voting in the 2010 midterm elections. The issue of the economy weighed heavily on voters, but the war and its cost, though clear to them and clearly related to the economy in their thinking, was a far less pressing concern.

U.S. people, if they do read or hear of it, may be shocked at the apparent unconcern of the crews of two U.S. helicopter gunships, which attacked and killed nine children on a mountainside in Afghanistan’s Kunar province, shooting them “one after another” this past Tuesday March 1st. (“The helicopters hovered over us, scanned us and we saw a green flash from the helicopters. Then they flew back high up, and in a second round they hovered over us and started shooting.” (NYT 3/2/11)).

Four of the boys were seven years old; three were eight, one was nine and the oldest was twelve. “The children were gathering wood under a tree in the mountains near a village in the district,” said Noorullah Noori, a member of the local development council in Manogai district. “I myself was involved in the burial,” Noori said. “Yesterday we buried them.” (AP, March 2, 2011) General Petraeus has acknowledged, and apologized for, the tragedy.

He has had many tragedies to apologize for, just counting Kunar province alone. Last August 26th, in the Manogai district, Afghan authorities accused international forces of killing six children during an air assault on Taliban positions. Provincial police chief Khalilullah Ziayee said a group of children were collecting scrap metal on the mountain when NATO aircraft dropped bombs to disperse Taliban fighters attacking a nearby base. “In the bombardment 6 children, aged six to 12, were killed,” the police commander said. “Another child was injured.”

In the Bamiyan province of Afghanistan, Zekirullah, a young Afghan friend of mine, age 15, rises at 2:00 a.m. several mornings each week and rides his donkey for six hours through the pre-dawn to reach a mountainside where he can collect scrub brush and twigs which he loads on the donkey in baskets. Then he heads home and stacks the wood – on top of his family’s home – to be taken down later and burned for heat. They don’t have electrical appliances to heat the home, and even if they did the villagers only get electricity for two hours a day, generally between 1:00 a.m. – 3:00 a.m. Families rely on their children to collect fuel for heat during the harsh winters and for cooking year round. Young laborers, wanting to help their families survive, mean no harm to the United States. They’re not surging at us, or anywhere: they’re not insurgents. They’re not doing anything to threaten us. They are children, and children anywhere are like children everywhere: they’re children like our own.

Sadly, more and more of us in America are getting used to the idea of child poverty – and even child labor – as our own economy sinks further under the burden of our latest nine years of war, of two billion dollars per week we spend creating poverty abroad that we can then emulate at home. Things are getting bad here, but in Afghanistan, children are bombed. Their bodies are casually dismembered and strewn by machines already lost in the horizon as the limbs settle. They lie in pools of blood until family members realize, one by one, that their children are not late in returning home but in fact never will.

In October and again in December of 2010, our small delegation of Voices for Creative Nonviolence activists met with a large family living in a wretched refugee camp. They had fled their homes in the San Gin district of the Helmand Province after a drone attack killed a mother there and her five children. The woman’s husband showed us photos of his children’s bloodied corpses. His niece, Juma Gul, age 9, had survived the attack. She and I huddled next to each other inside a hut made of mud on a chilly December morning. Juma Gul’s father stooped in front of us and gently unzipped her jacket, showing me that his daughter’s arm had been amputated by shrapnel when the U.S. missile hit their home in San Gin.

Next to Juma Gul was her brother, whose leg had been mangled in the attack. He apparently has no access to adequate medical care and experiences constant pain. The pilot of the attacking drone, perhaps controlling it from as far away as Creech Air Force Base here in the United States, knows nothing of this family or of the pain that he or she helped inflict. Nor do the commanders, the people who set up the base, the people who pay for it with their taxes, and the people who persist in electing candidates intent on indefinitely prolonging the war.

But sometimes the war is like it was this past Tuesday March 1st. Sometimes the issue is right in front of us – as it was to those helicopter crews – it’s up close so there can be no mistake as to what we are doing. According to the election polls we see the cost of war, dimly, but, as with the helicopter crews, it doesn’t affect – or prevent – our decisions. Afterwards we deplore the tragedy; we make a pretense of acknowledging the cost of war, but it is incalculable. We can’t hope to count it. We actually, finally, have to stop making people like the nine children who died on March 1st, pay it.~

Kathy Kelly (Kathy@vcnv.org) co-coordinates Voices for Creative Nonviolence www.vcnv.org and has worked closely with the Afghan Youth Peace Volunteers.

Leave a Comment

Filed under La Amistad Lent 2011, La Amistad Newsletter

A CHRISTMAS REFLECTION FROM ROSETTE STREET by mark colville

“Into this world, this demented inn, in which there is absolutely no room for him at all, Christ has come
uninvited. But because he cannot be at home in it, because he is out of place in it, his place is with those others for whom there is no room. His place is with those who do not belong, who are rejected by power because they are regarded as weak, those who are discredited, who are deprived the status of persons, those who are tortured, bombed and exterminated. With those for whom there is no room, Christ is present in the world… It is in these that he hides himself.” Thomas Merton

(reprinted from Xmas 2004)
Today we read the above passage, along with the Canticle of Zechariah, at out Thursday-morning
scripture reflection session. The living room was filled to overflowing, mostly with Spanish-speaking
immigrants. Among these were several Mexican women with small children. Typically these folks have been coming from the Chiapas area; they are “undocumented”, which is a kinder, gentler, politically-correct way of saying what we really mean: They are illegal. Illegal! Is it just me, or is there something downright looney about making people illegal? Most of the Mexicans in our neighborhood are devout Catholics, but we see very few in church. They tend to fear taking part in public events because of their immigration status. They come here desperate to feed their families, often having to leave behind dependents and send money home. They come to do the work that simply would not get done without them- planting, harvesting, sweat-shop labor, shoveling our s—, washing our cars. Their reward, aside from less-then-subsistence wages, is to be forced to live bent over, precariously and out of plain sight, under the radar. And the radar has been intensified in the past few months: On the day after Thanksgiving, the INS made a national sweep through Walmart stores (looking for terrorists?), and led hundreds away in handcuffs. Proposed legislation in Connecticut would make it illegal for undocumented immigrants to hold drivers licenses, which would classify their 5AM trip from New Haven to work in the suburbs, crowded into vans, as a crime. And now we hear of the federal government’s unprecedented intent to transfer responsibility for seeking out illegal immigrants from the INS to local authorities! This will make our friends afraid to call the police or fire department in emergencies, seek legal assistance, attend English class, or even go to a hospital emergency room. Such is the “security” that comes from the dividing the world into legal and illegal, persons and non-persons. It occurred to me that here, in our living room, during the third week of Advent, were sitting the people in whom Christ hides himself. How closely their lives resemble the first few years of Jesus’ own life: traveling far from home, forced to flee, unwelcome, hiding from state. “The people for whom there is no room.”
But they found room here! What a joy for us, that they feel it’s safe to come here!That is the gift
that we count most precious, the fact that Christ walks into our lives on a daily basis. I often struggle when
trying to explain what we do here at the Amistad Catholic Worker. We’re not very well organized, we lack
structure, and the work changes from week to week. Yes, we have an open door for meals, we give out food, clothes, furniture and other necessities as they become available. People take showers here and wash their clothes, and some come to stay for a night or a year or for as long as they can tolerate us. We also raise a voice of dissent to the system the illegalizes people, we insist on nonviolence, and we try our best to take prophetic stands for peace and justice. But none of these things describe what the Amistad House does.
We are not a program or an organization or a church or a help agency. We cannot boast of feeding or
housing multitudes. Rather, we are simply a place where nobody is illegal, where Christ is welcome, where the encounter with those for whom there is no room is available to all who choose to hang around a while. Our kitchen table is a eucharistic table, because it is where we break bread with Christ in the person of the poor. Often the encounter is not comfortable, because it tends to afflict those who experience it with the invitation to come closer. We get invited to make their struggles our own. We get invited to be angry about injustice and violence and poverty, and to feel the inescapable need to do something about them. We get invited to surrender some of our own security and privilege. We get invited to take risks in the effort to move from service to solidarity, which is what the gospels and our church’s teachings demand. And the further we move down that path, the more we confront the frightening reality of how much we need each other.
How can we speak of the events of this year – personal, communal, neighborhood, global? I’m
reminded of a story i once heard about one of the great saints (Was it Francis? It might as well have been) who was tending his garden one day, when someone came along and asked him, “What would you do if God told you that the world was to end this evening?” To which he replied, “I’d finish planting this row of beans.” The profundity of such a statement, of course, lies in it’s simplicity, a simplicity which flows from the conviction that God is in control, and the work at hand is precious because it is what God has given one to do. This year we have found the work at hand to be daunting, almost overwhelming at times, and much of it has seemed as pragmatically futile as planting beans when the world is about to end. I only wish we could learn to approach it with all the serenity of the gardener. But the fact is, we have found ourselves
responding to crisis after crisis- from the pain and suffering of those coming to our door, to running out
of money to pay the bills, to the insane war on Iraq, to the breakdown of our in-house community, to the house itself falling apart- and all too often with an anxiety that betrays our lack of faith. Through it all, the
material, moral and emotional support of you, our extended community, has been our daily bread. You
constantly remind us by your goodness that believing in God is inseparable from believing in each other.
Thank you, bless you, and peace be with you.

The Amistad Catholic Worker

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Eulogy for Father Tom Goekler, MM (Delivered by Mark Colville of the Amistad Catholic Worker, at Maryknoll, NY, Saturday, December 18, 2010)

The first thing to be said is that I’ve never in my life received a greater honor than to be invited to speak here today. Tom’s sister Peg tells me that the invitation came from Tom himself in a recent conversation she had with him; I’ll carry that as a precious gift for the rest of my days. My wife Luz and I are extremely grateful to you-Frances, Eleanor, Helen and Peg-for treating us like part of your family during this difficult walk into life without your brother, and we pledge today to continue that walk, with you, as family. We give thanks and condolences also to this great community called Maryknoll, in which Tom found his spiritual and apostolic family, as well as a plethora of kindred spirits. He was happy and proud to be counted among you.
There are many people here who are probably better equipped than I to give testimony to the life of this great spirit we celebrate today: Padre Tomas… Father Tom. I say this because there are some here, and perhaps hundreds more throughout the world who would tell you, if you asked them, that Padre Tomas literally saved their lives. Think of that. Here is a man that we knew, one we grew up with, a priest, one we worked and prayed with and sat at a table with and marched and went to jail and hung out at the beach with, and at the end of his life we can say ,without exaggerating, that he saved hundreds of our lives! This is extraordinary. We have brushed up against holiness, in the true sense of that word. Personally, as a fairly privileged kid coming from the suburbs of Connecticut, I can’t say that Father Tom saved my life- unless we consider helping one pull one’s head out of one’s tookas to be a lifesaving maneuver! But what I can do is what apparently Tom wanted me to do. I can stand here and hang my hat on the one thing that keeps piercing my heart today: Tom was my closest friend. I’m a lucky man.
The first time I met Tom was in 1981 at St. George’s Church in Guilford CT. I was a 19 year-old youth minister- a bit of a religious zealot at the time, as he was always fond of reminding me- and Tom had been invited by a group of adults at the parish to come down from Sacred Heart Church in Hartford’s North End-the poorest parish in the diocese- to give a series of talks on Liberation Theology. At the time, there were two significant things happening for the liberals at St. George parish: The Nicaraguan Revolution was in full swing (Tom was a big supporter of the Sandinistas), and the people of the parish were about to vote on a proposal to build a second parish hall, costing a half-million dollars, across from the first parish hall on the grounds of St. George’s. (Tom’s parish, meanwhile, was running the largest tutoring program in the state out of an old trailer with no heat, jammed up against the church sacristy). Well, anyone who knew Tom then or now can be certain as to which of these realities became the frame around which he chose to discuss the finer points of Liberation Theology. Nicaragua never came up. He railed about the state of Connecticut being the most segregated place in the entire country, with the greatest disparity between rich and poor, and lamented the fact that Catholics in Connecticut had not managed to reflect anything different from such a diabolical systemic situation. He kept using that word: diabolical. What did that mean? It was a word I’d never heard outside of cartoons or superhero comic strips. But he wasn’t joking, and the word was carefully chosen. Diabolical. Poverty, and the violence that is inflicted by poverty, is diabolical. Our failure to understand that our core mission as Catholics is to take up the Cross in resistance to the violence of poverty, is diabolical. The economic injustice that we’ve allowed to fester in the Archdiocese of Hartford- it’s all diabolical. I guess you could say that if Tom was here right now and I had the opportunity to tell him how much I loved him, I’d probably begin with, “You had me at ‘diabolical’”. Anyway, I had organized a group of young people to come hear Tom’s talks, and as the temperature began to reach the boiling point in that room, the kids and I were fascinated. We were watching a fight break out between a priest and a bunch of very nice, good-hearted, churchgoing people, and we couldn’t wait to see how this thing was going to end!
And the fact is, it hasn’t ended. Tom spent his entire life afflicting our consciences with a clear and unbending sense of justice and morality, as well as a coherent analysis of the movement of evil in the world. And in doing this, he moved us- sometimes literally- from where we were at to where we had ought to be.
Tom convinced us that we were very important. He convinced us that what we chose to do with our lives, starting from the smallest decisions and including those we would normally regard as personal ones, was very, very important. It could change the world. WE could change the world. I could change the world simply by seeing, for example, that my college education was not a commodity, it did not belong to me, like some tool for upward mobility and the acquisition of creature comforts; it belonged at the service of others, particularly those who did not have the privilege of the education that I’d received. I could change the world by understanding that my home need not be a place apart, where I flee from reality to a “safe” neighborhood with my own family to find refuge from the world; it could be a place where the poor are my neighbors, where my family and I could open the doors and invite the world in, so that we all might find refuge together. These things are not beyond us, they’re within our power. Tom’s thinking was not only countercultural, it was downright aggravating, and so annoyingly subversive of the plans we had been making for ourselves. He turned our lives upside down- and we didn’t often thank him for it!- simply by refusing to acknowledge the limitations we had somehow pre-programmed into our vision of what was possible. In short, Tom did not empower people- he knew that God had already done that. Tom loved us into finding our power, whether we were a sheltered White kid from the suburbs or a Puerto Rican from Bellevue Square in the North End, or a gang banger on the streets of San Pedro Sula, or an underground Catholic in China, or an abused child in Paraiso Dos, Zona 18, Guatemala. And above all, he never let us- not any one of us- get away with thinking or acting like we were less than what God had created us to be. That would be diabolical.
Father Tom Goekler was first and foremost an apostle among the poor. He founded Caminando Por La Paz, and Jovenes En La Calle, two programs that have led hundreds of young people out of street gangs and thousands into new homes, first in San Pedro Sula, Honduras, and currently in Guatemala City.  He was a co-founder of the Amistad Catholic Worker in New Haven, Connecticut, and the Catholic Worker always remained his home. In the 1970′s and 80′s, as pastor of Sacred Heart Church in Hartford’s North End, he mentored a youth group and tutoring program which became models for human development and from which dozens of Hartford’s best community leaders have arisen. Father Tom was a single-minded, single-hearted and tireless advocate for the betterment of people’s lives. He stood firm on principles that we often overlooked or thought unimportant, because his vision of right and wrong was never abstract; it was always rooted in his love for specific people and his desire to shoulder their burdens and be a part of their liberation.
But Tom was something more than what we saw in his public life and prophetic witness, and I only came to realize it in these later years as his spiritual journey unfolded: He was a monk. Tom was a monk who joyfully chose to dwell in the noisiest, most crowded and stress-ridden places, needing nothing more than the poor possessed, practicing radical nonviolence, reading Thomas Merton (his favorite spiritual teacher), praying constantly and bearing the simple loving presence of God. He stood in places where it often must have seemed that the world was literally falling down around him, and there he would stand, and wait, and then calmly go about picking up the pieces. He found serenity in a well-developed interior life, a serenity by which he could love solitude and silence but not require them to be happy, or centered in God, or mindful of the presence of God in others. Most of all, Tom had a kind of interior discipline which enabled him to be an incredibly thoughtful person, with a seemingly boundless energy for reaching out to the people in his life. In the end, this combination of monk and missioner proved to be extremely powerful and transformative. Every place that Tom lived became better- more peaceful, more cooperative, more educated, safer, and more beautiful- by the time he left.
Across so many borders, whether national, racial, socio-economic or cultural, or simply those boundaries created by the fear we’ve learned to have of one another, somehow Tom managed to get us all sitting at the table together, speaking a common language, each knowing in our hearts that we belonged there. It’s occurred to me often since I learned of his death that everything Tom taught us might be captured in this one statement: “EVERYONE belongs at the table”. How different might the world look by next year if we all went forth from this chapel today insisting on that in every aspect of our lives the way Tom did with his life. “EVERYONE belongs at the table.” It was a conviction that truly became a lifestyle for him, devoted as he was to Dorothy Day and the Catholic Worker Movement. He and Dorothy shared something very foundational in common: they believed very deeply in, and were unshakably sustained by, the celebration of the Eucharist, not only as a formative ritual but as a model for life. They understood, at a mystical depth, that the encounter with that same Christ who is present at the eucharistic table is available to us daily, in the world, in the streets, at our own kitchen tables, to the extent that we choose to welcome Christ, to walk with Christ, to seek solidarity with Christ, in the person of the poor.
One of Tom’s last little projects came to fruition this past April, when he and a group of friends bought a small house in the woods of Pennsylvania. It is meant to be a place of respite, open to all of us who are “on the way” together, a place to gather and find serenity, to conspire against the diabolical, and to celebrate life. It still needs a little work. But he truly loved that place, and looked forward to spending a great deal of time there in the coming years. The prospect of not being able to share those years with my best friend is a sadness and a grief that I still have yet to confront…and I ask your prayers. But I think it would make Tom very happy now if you would come and visit that house. Consider it his parting gift, a way of keeping him close to your heart and honoring all the goodness he embodied. But please come- talk to me about it and we’ll make it happen- I guarantee that you will feel his presence there.
And I’ll close with this: When Thomas Merton’s dear friend Boris Pasternak died- a man who Merton revered- he wrote this simple entry in his monastic journal: “Pasternak died Monday. His story is finished. It is now meant to be understood.”
Tom Goekler has died. His story, too, is finished. But not for the people in Guatemala and Honduras, who continue to depend on his life-saving work. That work is now at risk, and it must continue. We, who understand, must insist on it. Because Tom’s is a good story, it’s a really good story. It’s worth telling again, and again, every time we gather, until we all understand.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Where Hope is Demolished, Terror Thrives

[This piece was originally published in the Fall/Winter 2009 issue of La Amistad, newsletter of the Amistad Catholic Worker]

by Mark Colville

In May of this year, I travelled to the West Bank as part of a Catholic Worker Peace Team.  (Intending first to enter Gaza with twenty thousand dollars-worth of medical supplies, and to interview victims of the relentless, murderous Israeli assault there three months earlier, the six-member team was stopped at the Rafah border and thwarted from completing that mission.  Thankfully, we did manage to arrange delivery of the  medical supplies through clandestine means.)

For what I saw and witnessed in the West Bank, no amount of study or analysis or prayer could have prepared me adequately.  I was spiritually wounded by the apartheid conditions in Behtlehem, Jerusalem and Hebron.  I was heartbroken by the sufferings of families who invited us into their homes, and into their daily  nightmares.  I was deeply disturbed at seeing people treated like animals and living as refugees in their own land for three generations.

I came home convinced of at least one simple fact: The oppression of the Palestinian people is, in the United States at least, an unheard, unpopular, and mostly ignored story.  It is a global scandal, an atrocity that cries out to God for justice… And, surely, God is watching…

On a hillside near Hebron, we were hosted at the family farm of Attah and Jowdie Jabbar, two brothers whose family have lived on that same  hill for five centuries.  Jowdie stood in front of the ruins of his home, which was demolished by the Israeli government.  The farm, too, has lain fallow this year, as the Israelis have shut off the water and confiscated the irrigation pipes. He explained that a few months earlier, Jewish settlers from the adjacent illegal Kiryat Arba settlement came to the house in the middle of the night and broke all the windows. Falling glass injured his three-year-old daughter whom he carried to the hospital several miles away in Hebron, since he had no car. The daughter was hospitalized for six days at great cost to the family, and was left blind in one eye. Jowdi said that when the settlers destroyed his house he went to the police station where the Israeli police “talked to me like a dog and to the settlers like kings.” He also told the us, ” My children have not been able to sleep through the night since this glass breaking.”

Shortly after that, Jowdi said, the Israelis came on a Friday telling him that his house was going to be demolished. Muslim lawyers do not work on Friday, their sabbath, and Israeli courts are not open on Saturday, the Jewish sabbath.  Jowdi’s house was bulldozed early on Sunday. He had no resort to the courts. He said, “I never did anything to the Israeli government.” He added, “The land does not belong to the Palestinians or the Israelis. It’s God’s land.” His brother Attah agreed, “We are all guests here.”

In the Silwan neighborhood of Jerusalem, just a short walk downhill from the ancient holy city, we photographed the ruins of one of three Palestinian homes that were recently demolished. The family living here was given only 20 minutes to remove their personal possessions before the home was bulldozed into rubble.

There are 85 homes in the crowded Silwan neighborhood with active demolition orders.  One such home belongs to Abu Dian Fahkri, a Palestinian father of 5 and grandfather of 3, whose ancestors have lived in Silwan for generations.  Mr. Fahkri invited us in for a cold drink.  He explained that he has lived on this site since he was a small boy.  In the mid 1960′s he began petitioning for a permit to build on his own property, but was repeatedly denied without reason- this despite the fact that such permits were (and are today) routinely granted to non-Palestinians. By the mid-seventies his family had grown beyond the home’s capacity, and he decided to build an additional floor without a permit.  This is the justification, he told us, that the Israeli authorities are now using to destroy his house.

“I was born here,” Abu Dian Fahkri told us. “My memories are here. A Jewish settler told me that this land is only for Jews and I should go to Jordan. I said the land is for all of us… Up to now, the municipality has succeeded in psychologically demolishing us. Every night my children ask, ‘Will they demolish our home tonight.”

The Israeli government has demolished more than 24,000 Palestinian homes since it occupied East Jerusalem, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip in 1967.  Angela Godfrey-Goldstein, action advocacy officer for The Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions (ICAHD), called the policy one of “quiet transfer”, intended to get Palestinians out and to increase the Jewish percentage of the population.  She, along with many other Israelis we met, believes that house demolitions and the Israeli invasion of Gaza is “creating conditions in which terrorism thrives.”

Despite its continually unscrutinized crimes against peace and humanity, Israel receives about three billion dollars a year in unrestricted military aid from the United States.  (Just this week, Congress has voted to condemn the internationally respected findings of the Goldstone report, a UN-commissioned inquiry into probable war crimes committed by Israel in Gaza.)  In the next issue of La Amistad, I’ll discuss our experience of the illegal separation wall and its devastating impact in Palestinian life.  In the meantime, please seek out and support organizations like ICAHD, Rabbis For Human Rights, Jewish Voice For Peace, and the Middle East Crisis Committee; get some truth and raise some questions about unquestioned military aid to Israel. It is time to stop letting our tax dollars subsidize such oppression.

1 Comment

Filed under La Amistad Fall/Winter 2009, La Amistad Newsletter

Dateline: Guatemala

[This piece was originally published in the Fall/Winter 2009 issue of La Amistad, newsletter of the Amistad Catholic Worker]

by Fr. Tom Goekler, MM                                                                                                                        Casa Juan Gerardi Catholic Worker, Guatemala City

September 2009

The apostolate here in Guatemala seems to be finding it’s own rhythm. The ¨garage¨ is going through an amazing transformation as I hope is happening internally with the inhabitants of the house. This weekend we should be finishing up the three new second floor rooms. Juan Carlos has already started constructing the supports to lay a second floor to what will become our public tutoring and computer area. Juan Carlos and Odel have done all the designing and construction work and are rightfully proud of what is evolving. It actually is aesthetically lovely.

A major concern of mine over the years has been to not fall into the pitfall of those working and living with a foreigner (in this case me) living differently than the rest in a marginalized neighborhood. Trying to live the Catholic Worker simple lifestyle is one way to implement this ideal. Designing a space that is dignified but also completes this ideal of simplicity is another way. With the help of Juan Carlos and Odel we are well on our way to completing these goals.

One of the faults of our movement, and there have been many, has been to sidestep the political and structural realities that so condition the lives of our people. We have emphasized with the visiting groups relating with the young people that so capture the hearts of those groups who come to help and learn. One of the drawbacks is that people leave thinking that they have done good for others without facing the stark reality of entrenched money and power that insure that these same people will be condemned to a life of poverty and misery.

It’s true that to engage the young who are marginated without having a good political and structural analysis leads to sentimentalism and fundamentalism. It was hard for me to understand how so many Christian groups could have traveled to HAITI and internalize so little awareness of the situation of dependency  and corruption that was inherent in the dynamics that led to the overthrow of the popularly elected government a number of years ago.

Now the same phenomenon has repeated itself in Honduras. While I was in the States, there was an overthrow of the democratically elected president. When I asked an astute veteran Maryknoll priest who has worked in Maryknoll administration in Central America for almost four decades to sum up the situation, he responded, “That’s easy: the rich against the poor”

Historically the foreign policy of the United States has sided with the rich. Are there signs of a real change in stance or with the present governmental overthrow will it be business as usual? This question is more complicated that in may appear. By all assurances the United States administration seems to be opposed to the overthrow of the government but this does not completely clarify the position of middle management bureaucrats and vested economic interests that are accustomed to manipulate the political system for their own personal advantage. Over the decade that we labored to host almost 40 groups of visitors to Honduras, it’s a good time to question our work. How many of our visitors are presently putting into practice what they felt and experienced in Chamelecon to be in solidarity on the side of the poor wherever they presently find themselves?

Also unfortunately (I like the word in Spanish better: lamentablemente) when push comes to shove the hierarchical church has usually sided with the rich. The ecclesial statements over the years are beautiful. The theory is biblical and well stated. But in practice… In Honduras the only structural Church presence that has “resisted” the overthrow from the beginning are the Jesuits who are in pastoral work in El Progreso which is on the other side of the San Pedro Sula airport from Chamelecón and the Bishop of the Santa Rosa diocese who is Honduras. Only 3 of the 9 Bishops in
Honduras are natives.

The political dynamics in Guatemala are no different just more sophisticated and more complicated than in Honduras and in Haiti. In Guatemala City which has approximately the population of Chicago, 178 bus drivers and helpers have been assassinated this year. Extortion is in, in all it’s forms. In this type of crime its is chilling to realize the collusion of women especially young women in this manner of terrorizing ordinary people. Two recent assassinations are of particular note. Fr Larry Raushburg an OMI  priest (Order of Mary Immaculate) who was famous for his work with the poor in Brazil was killed about 3 months ago. He had been in Guatemala for almost two decades living very simply and always resisting in favor of the poor. He was killed in the same area that Fr. Bill Woods, a Maryknoll priest, was murdered over thirty years ago. The murder was neither accidental nor a common robbery.

A lawyer named Rodrigo Rosenberg was assassinated while riding his bicycle. He had completed a video a few days before his assassination speaking of a possible assassination and putting the responsibility, if it came to pass, at the feet of the president of Guatemala and some named, well placed, business people. A few days later he was assassinated. The video was shown in the cemetery at his burial. In the first week there were 650,000 hits to view the video on internet. So far 10 people have been arrested for the murder. These include eight members of the national police, a former member of the national police, and a former member of the military. It seems that 500 quetzales or $350 can buy this type of service. It is very unpopular to speak about these realities, or especially to preach about these realities in Guatemala. People believe that if you don’t talk about it, it will go away.

I was speaking yesterday at our diocesan priest’s meeting with a priest from Spain who has served here for many years. He is a member of a congregation in Spain which is a lot like Maryknoll in the United States. We were speaking of the relationship of Honduras and Guatemala. His comment: Honduras has a Toque de queda (a state of siege) but Guatemala is a Queda de Toque (the government itself is in a constant siege mentality)

I agree with Barack Obama’s comments in the United Nations. The USA can support other countries but they have to take their own responsibility of cleaning up corruption and inefficiency. However, this necessitates that the United States stop supporting the most notorious criminals in other countries. The first step in this process would be to close for good the SAB which is the “School of Americas” which has trained the worst of the Latin American killers. The latest of this list is the present head of the military in Honduras who has just engineered the overthrow of the institutionally elected government.

NOTES for further explanation:

1.  When John Negroponte was the ambassador to Honduras (1980 – 1985) and with the collusion of the United States Embassy, there was a new constitution written as part of the agreement to end the military dictatorship and elect by popular vote a president. To insure a weak presidency and that political control of the country world remain in the hands of the economic elite there was written into the constitution articles that could not be changed, one being that the president could never seek a second term. Mel Zelaya challenged that article and called for a plebiscite (not binding) on the issue. The day of the plebiscite was the day of the overthrow of the government by the actual controlling powers. The underlying issue here is that in recent years many Latin American governments who actually are trying to improve the lot of the poor have modified their constitutions so that the president can have a second term. These include the countries of Ecuador and Bolivia who have very popular elected presidents. The problem for entrenched business interests is that these government are using some of the wind falls that the rich always divided among themselves for better education, health and job training programs. This is anathema to the rich. Michelletti (the Bernie Madoff of Honduras) and his cohorts did a preemptive strike to ensure that this was not going to happen in Honduras.

2.  In countries like Guatemala and Honduras the powerful are protected by the “law of impunity.” Basically this means that is if you hold any political office you cannot be charged with any crime. This institutionalizes a corrupt political process. Obama was attacking this stance in his United Nations speech.

Our movement has been strong on education. My fear is that we will repeat history, empower young people, even those educated in Catholic Institutions within Central America or the United States to use their education to enter the governmental “or non – profit organization” beaurocracy  and use their position to begin systematically to rob the poor which has been so much of the history. Hopefully with our leadership training programs and biblical / societal workshops we are empowering young people in another way.

If you receive either Maryknoll Magazine or Maryknoll Revista Magazine, there is a good article on our work in the September 2009 issue.

My new e-mail address is:  tfgoekler@yahoo.com

1 Comment

Filed under La Amistad Fall/Winter 2009, La Amistad Newsletter